Where the bench’s money is, what it just did, and what’s next in line.
Every counter in this country has a tip jar. Ours is transparent. Literally.
We spent years on the other side of a cannabis counter — so we built our funding the same way we build everything else: out in the open, where you can watch it work.
And the industry? The industry doesn’t get a jar. The industry gets a sponsor package, a firewall, and its name published next to exactly what it paid for — the platform, never a verdict.
No goals. No deadlines. No thermometer. Just a jar, doing arithmetic in public.
| Date | The Jar | Test Covered | Front of the Line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch | Open — first test in the works | — | The line forms at the question box |
Your drop carries a voice. Every drop in the Test Jar can carry a request — the product you’re curious about, the label claim you don’t buy, the thing your budtender couldn’t answer. Requests aren’t purchases and they aren’t promises (the lawyers made us say that; they’re right). They’re the bench’s suggestion box, weighted by the people keeping it alive. When the jar covers the next test, the most-asked-for products are at the front of the line.
Every review this jar covers publishes the same line, forever: Funded by the member jar. Bought at [store], [city] — full retail. Receipt on file. No sponsor money touched this test.
This page is a sibling of our Algorithm Health Checker — same idea, different vital sign. That board shows how the platforms treat our journalism. This one shows how Canada treats it.
Because the jar isn’t just funding — it’s a barometer. What you rank on the story board tells us what you want covered. What lands in the jar tells us how much it matters to you. Together they’re the most honest audience measurement there is: not clicks, not impressions — a country deciding, in public, what its cannabis journalism digs into next.
You steer the stories. You fuel the bench. We do the work and show the receipts. That’s the whole deal.